9 December 2025
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) 81,018.54 4.67%.
Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) 2,913.20 8.81%.
xrp
XRP (XRP) 1.86 4.52%.
bnb
BNB (BNB) 794.25 3.24%.
Solana
Left (LEFT) 123.86 5.90%.
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) 0.131244 6.69%.
cardano
Cardano (ADA) 0.411618 9.24%.
chainlink
Chainlink (LINK) 12.85 8.81%.
Bitcoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) 505.97 0.77%.
Litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) 75.00 4.34%.
polkadot
Polka dots (DOT) 2.03 10.08%.
dai
Dai (DAI) 0.858999 0.05%.
pepper
Pepe (PEPE) 0.000004 1.42%.
ethereum-classic
Ethereum Classic (ETC) 12.21 5.78%.
Monero
Monero (XMR) 323.48 0.87%.
New title: possible additional tax on football player wages causes unrest at football clubs

Possible extra tax on football players' wages causes unrest at football clubs

Reading time: 2 minutes

An unremarkable element in last week's federal budget agreement is now in the spotlight. It appeared that the De Wever government had decided to exclude professional athletes from an earlier political deal on a wage cut, which has been in effect since July. This cut allows companies to avoid paying social security contributions on the portion of gross wages exceeding €340.000. euro per year. For anything below that amount, they continue to pay the regular employer contribution of 25 percent.

The impact on football clubs

The idea was to exclude professional athletes from this favorable arrangement. This was expected to result in an annual structural saving of 10 million euros by 2029. The measure is primarily aimed at footballers, who are the highest earners in the sports world. A professional footballer in Belgium earns an average of around a quarter of a million euros, while at top clubs this can reach half a million euros. If the football If they lost these benefits, there would be a major impact on the payroll of the top clubs.

Political discussion and possible blockades

MR Deputy Prime Minister David Clarinval appears to oppose the plan, supported by Georges-Louis Bouchez, president of the professional club Francs Borains. The question is not only whether footballers will be allowed to retain the favorable arrangement, but also whether the entire exemption will be scrapped within six months of its introduction. The debate also centers on whether a specific professional group can simply be excluded from the scheme and whether this would violate the Constitutional Court's principle of non-discrimination.

Additional tax burden and other budgetary measures

Besides this potential additional tax burden, professional clubs are also affected by other budgetary measures. For example, the average reduction in withholding tax due on wages will be frozen next year. Clubs will also feel the impact of the increased VAT on match ticket sales and hospitality revenue.

On top of that, there's the recent rupture in the media deal with sports channel DAZN, which terminated a five-year deal with professional football – worth €84 million per year. The financial consequences of this will be played out in court in the coming weeks.

Share this article:
Mail EED 468X60@2x
Disclaimer: The information on Block 9 is for general informational and educational purposes only. While we strive to provide up-to-date, correct and relevant content, we make no warranties as to the completeness, accuracy or reliability of the information provided. All content on this website, including articles, analyses, opinions and other publications, is for general information purposes only and does not constitute professional or legal advice in any way, including but not limited to financial, investment or tax advice.

Block 9 makes no guarantees or representations as to any possible results or returns that may arise from the use of information on this website. Nothing on this website should be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any particular asset, including but not limited to cryptocurrencies, tokens or other financial instruments.

The opinions and views expressed in contributions by editors, external authors or community members are strictly personal and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Block 9 as a platform. Block 9 accepts no liability for any loss or damage – direct or indirect – resulting from the use of (or reliance on) the information published on this website.

Investing in cryptocurrencies and other digital assets involves significant risks. The value of such assets can fluctuate significantly, and there is a chance that you could lose (some of) your investment. We strongly recommend that you always do your own research (DYOR) and seek independent advice from a qualified financial advisor before making any financial decisions. By using this website, you agree to this disclaimer and accept that Block 9 is not responsible for your investment choices or the results thereof.
Smart insiders are reading along – are you too?
Don't miss an update, sign up for our newsletter.
bitcoin
bitcoin

Bitcoin (BTC)

Pricing
81,018.54
Ethereum
Ethereum

Ethereum (ETH)

Pricing
2,913.20
xrp
xrp

XRP (XRP)

Pricing
1.86
Connect with Block #9
block9news
1K+ Followers
🤳 Become a Fan
@block9news
1K+ Followers
📸 Follow Us
@block9news
1K+ Followers
📸 Follow Us

Not to be missed:

Widow Loses Nearly $1 Million in Crypto Scam: AI Tech Exposes 'Pig Butchering' Scam
Zcash Introduces Dynamically Fixed Fees for User Affordability
HashKey Files for Hong Kong IPO, Aims to Become First Listed Crypto Exchange
400.000 Bitcoin Exited Exchanges: Indicative of Long-Term Holding Strategies and Boosted Confidence
Stay smartly informed
The future doesn’t wait – always stay one step ahead and receive the latest news, exclusive updates and key insights directly to your inbox. Sign up for our newsletter and stay ahead.
Copyright © 2025
Redwind BV