EU Cuts Ties on Russian Gas – Moscow's Allies Call It a Big Mistake

The European Commission has set an ambitious target to end imports of Russian energy, including gas, oil, nuclear fuel and LNG, by 2027. The plan, which will be presented in early June, aims to ensure the energy independence of Europe to ensure. But not all EU member states are enthusiastic about this; in Eastern Europe in particular, fierce criticism is heard, with terms such as “economic suicide” often being invoked.

Fierce opposition from Bratislava and Budapest

The Commission stresses that these measures are essential to prevent Europe from continuing to support the Kremlin in its military efforts. Energy Commissioner Dan Jorgensen recently described the country’s dependence on Russia as “untenable”, referring to Putin’s use of energy as a political weapon.

In Slovakia and Hungary, however, the policy is seen as a direct threat to economic interests. Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico calls it a “radical and damaging change of course” and argues that the idea of ​​a bone of contention between Europe and Russia is far from realistic. His Hungarian counterpart Péter Szijjártó goes even further, describing the proposal on social media as “politically motivated” and warning that it would jeopardize his country’s energy security. Both countries have taken steps in the past to slow EU policy toward Moscow and continue to oppose the extension of sanctions.

No veto right required

However, the scope for Hungary and Slovakia to block the plan is limited. Legislation can be approved more easily with a qualified majority, meaning that the dissenting votes of a few countries will not be able to block the process. The Commission has conveyed this message clearly.

Despite a significant decline in Russian energy imports in the EU — in 2021 it was still 45%, while in 2024 it has fallen to 19% — phasing out gas is not as easy as phasing out oil or coal. This is partly due to the absence of alternative energy sources in several Member States.

This plan once again exposes the internal tensions within the EU. While some countries are under time pressure to part with Russian energy, others point to the social and economic consequences of such a drastic step. In particular, countries that are heavily dependent on cheap energy and lower incomes are looking for ways to cooperate without endangering their own situation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does the EU want to divest itself of Russian energy?
The EU is aiming for greater energy independence to avoid supporting the Kremlin in military actions while ensuring the stability of Europe's energy supply.

How do Slovakia and Hungary react to the plan?
Both Slovakia and Hungary strongly criticize the plans, seeing them as a threat to their economic interests and believing the proposal is unrealistic for their energy supply.

Is there a possibility for these countries to block the proposal?
Hungary and Slovakia have limited options to block the proposal, as it requires a qualified majority, meaning that a few member states voting is not enough to halt the process.